茄子视频

Explore

Amid National Voucher Push, Missouri Once Again Turns to Open Enrollment

For the fifth year in a row, lawmakers are debating whether to allow all students in the state the option of transferring to different districts.

The Missouri State Capitol (Getty Images)

Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter

Lawmakers in Missouri are debating a move that could significantly expand families鈥 educational options. Within the K鈥12 politics of 2025, however, the proposal has an almost retro feel. 

In March, the state House of Representatives that would allow students to transfer to public school districts outside their community of residence, a policy known as 鈥渙pen enrollment.鈥 If it became law, districts would have the option to decline student transfers from other areas, but could not prevent their own students from leaving. Per-pupil funding from the state, totalling roughly $6,700, would follow each child to his or her new destination.

It鈥檚 a somewhat familiar idea. According to the nonprofit Education Commission of the States, some form of interdistrict transfer, whether through voluntary agreements between communities or via statewide mandate. In Missouri itself, the House has passed statewide legislation for the last five consecutive years, only to have it stall in the state Senate.

In troubled districts like St. Louis, too, it has become common for families to select among schools in nearby suburbs, mostly through effort. Advocacy groups like the have also attempted to draw attention to parents prosecuted for falsifying their addresses to send their kids to better-performing districts.

Yet open enrollment 鈥 and the occasionally fierce debates it triggers 鈥 has also been somewhat overshadowed in recent years as calls have grown for private offerings like education savings accounts and tax-credit scholarships. With Republicans at the state and national level supporting the channeling of public funds to non-public institutions, 鈥渟chool choice鈥 has increasingly come to imply 鈥減rivate school choice.鈥

Republican Rep. Brad Pollitt, the bill鈥檚 sponsor, said his aim was to allow parents to exercise more autonomy without having to leave the traditional school system. With birth rates falling and of students to homeschooling, he continued, public schools needed 鈥渁 seat at the table鈥 during discussions of choice. 

鈥淲hatever the percentage of people that want to see a different option 鈥 maybe a better fit for their family, depending on work or other factors 鈥 I just want them to have another choice in the public school system instead of going to ESAs, a charter school, or even a virtual school,” Pollitt told The 74.

But critics of the proposal say it will introduce still more instability into school finance and governance, ultimately leading to districts battling among themselves for families who operate as free agents. Todd Fuller, the communications director of the Missouri State Teachers Association, said he worried that a 鈥渄ownward spiral鈥 of competition would benefit a few districts and gradually strip the rest of badly needed resources.

鈥淚t’s not going to happen all at once,鈥 he said. 鈥淥ver the course of time, there will be less services,鈥 he said. 鈥淚’ve seen districts already that tell their students, ‘Sorry, we don’t have foreign languages,’ or, ‘Sorry, we don’t have a science class that you should take.’鈥

鈥楩amilies are leaving in droves鈥

Inter-district transfers are one of the oldest and most common forms of school choice across the United States. Indeed, Missouri already provides , allowing parents to take the necessary step of switching districts if their own does not include a high school.

More controversially, students attending schools that have lost accreditation 鈥 usually for persistently low academic performance 鈥 of leaving for a higher-achieving school elsewhere. That scenario was most vividly illustrated in the case of the Normandy school district, which by the state in 2013. 

The resulting exodus was far greater than anticipated, with about 1,000 students (roughly 25 percent of all enrolled) that fall. Neighboring districts spent years fighting to reject their transfers, arguing that they could not provide space or meet the learning needs of so many new pupils, before ultimately yielding and a .

Peter Franzen is the associate director of the , an organization that supports parent empowerment and school choice. Having worked for decades in and around communities severely impacted by poverty and poor services, he said he believed the Normandy experience illustrated the existing appetite for open enrollment among families who are otherwise told to wait for solutions that may never come. 

“If a quarter of your school drains out because nobody wants to be there, who the hell wants to put their taxes into that? I don’t care how proud you are of your school 鈥 if families are leaving in droves, what could you possibly say to that?”

Education leaders in the state have long had to work with troubled or under-resourced districts, most famously St. Louis and Kansas City, where of the overwhelmingly disadvantaged student population can read or do math at grade level. Both cities feature a wide array of choice options, including charter and magnet schools, and over the past few decades.

Students were also able to enroll in nearby suburbs under the terms of long-lasting desegregation orders. But St. Louis鈥檚 desegregation program has new students, leading some to worry that they will miss a chance to receive a better education outside the city. 

But with the passage of statewide open enrollment, smaller districts could suddenly be placed in the same position as some of the largest communities in the state. Missouri is home to a large number of rural districts, including many high-quality teachers. According to , nearly half of all those districts are operating on a four-day school week, which has been generally shown to student achievement.

The bill passed in the state House partly addresses the concerns of districts that fear instability in headcounts by capping the number of student departures at 3 percent of total enrollment annually. But John Benyon, superintendent of Cape Girardeau Public Schools in southeast Missouri, said that restriction could nevertheless compound into unsustainable losses over time.

鈥淓ven a gradual loss of 3 percent each year can have a compounding effect, particularly for smaller districts,鈥 Benyon wrote in an email. 鈥淥ver time, this could lead to school closures and consolidations, which would not only disrupt students but also deeply impact the identity of small, rural Missouri communities.鈥

Rural GOP resistance

The legislation is now scheduled for a hearing in the state Senate, which has persistently declined to pass earlier versions over the last half-decade. Pollitt said his bill, which has been supported almost exclusively by Republicans each time he has offered it, aimed for a middle ground in the ongoing school choice debate.

鈥淚n the Senate, it’s never been drastic enough,鈥 he reflected. 鈥淭hose who are for total school choice think it doesn’t go far enough, and those who are against any school choice think it goes too far. That’s why I think it’s a good bill.”

Just last year, the state GOP struck a bargain to the size of Missouri鈥檚 tax credit scholarship system, which facilitates student enrollment in private schools. They have yet to advance legislation that would allow for universal access to ESAs or other voucher-like programs, which have been rapidly adopted in a rash of Republican-led states since the pandemic.

Pollitt, who is currently campaigning for a seat in the state Senate, observed that resistance in the upper chamber is largely concentrated among rural Republicans concerned about the fate of their local public schools if students begin to leave in large numbers. That same dynamic has colored intra-partisan clashes in states like Texas, where resistant legislators have been met with primary challenges for opposing the spread of ESAs. 

In Missouri, he acknowledged, changes to enrollments would likely create 鈥渨inners and losers.鈥 Still, his proposal found new momentum after being endorsed by newly elected Republican Gov. Michael Kehoe in his . 

Benyon, meanwhile, has recently traveled to Jefferson City with members of his school board to lobby against the measure. Though he said students in his district enjoyed access to a range of coveted offerings, including extracurricular opportunities and advanced coursework, he added that already-struggling communities would likely lose students if open enrollment becomes a reality. Instead of opening new avenues for flight, he concluded, the state should work with those schools to make them more attractive places to learn.

鈥淚n cases where other districts are underperforming, shouldn’t we be asking why and working to fix those root issues?鈥

Did you use this article in your work?

We鈥檇 love to hear how The 74鈥檚 reporting is helping educators, researchers, and policymakers.

Republish This Article

We want our stories to be shared as widely as possible 鈥 for free.

Please view The 74's republishing terms.





On The 74 Today