New Report: Special Ed Students, English Learners Face Greatest Setbacks
'Too slow, too uneven:' Pandemic recovery particularly challenging for the growing number of students with disabilities and those learning English.
Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter
All of the conditions that have bedeviled students鈥 post-COVID learning recovery 鈥 high rates of absenteeism, school staffing shortages, academic setbacks and disruptions 鈥 have been worse for English learners and students with disabilities, according to the latest
鈥淭he thing that really struck us as we looked across all of the data points 鈥 [is] there鈥檚 just a disproportionate impact for those [special populations of] students across the board,鈥 said Robin Lake, director of the at Arizona State University. 鈥淲hat I think really came through to us 鈥 especially in the parent interviews we conducted this year 鈥 was parents were experiencing a system that wasn鈥檛 functioning even before the pandemic effectively for them.鈥

At a press conference Tuesday, Lake called the report鈥檚 findings a 鈥渨arning bell for systemic reform.鈥
Disadvantaged students continue 鈥渂earing the brunt of slow and uneven recovery鈥 from pandemic-era school closures, Lake said, and their struggles come at a time when their numbers are growing.
There was a surge of roughly 343,000 students identified for special education from the 2020鈥21 to the 2022鈥23 school years a trend which appears on track to continue. There are variations across states and student groups, with Black and Hispanic students being identified at higher rates.
Lake said researchers are still trying to determine if this is just normal catch-up following under-identification during school closures, or if something more is going on.
The 2024 State of the American Student Report builds on two previous annual reports, which detailed the impact of COVID on students鈥 academic performance and well-being. Last year鈥檚 research focused on older students with little-to-no time left in the K-12 system, who saw what the organization described as 鈥渟hocking declines鈥 in college and career readiness. This year, CRPE interviewed parents and dug into data around particularly vulnerable student populations.
The academic impacts on students with disabilities and their rate of recovery varied from district to district, according to a CRPE-commissioned analysis by Georgia State professor Tim Sass. This, they believe, shows that what schools and districts did during and after the pandemic had real impact, but more research is needed to learn what kind of mitigation and recovery strategies proved most effective.
More than four years after COVID emerged, the average student who experienced school closures is still less than halfway to a , but Lake emphasized that averages can obscure particular students’ nuanced experiences. 鈥淯nder the hood of average,鈥 she said, she saw reason for both optimism and concern.
The good news: Students are bouncing back in some areas. The average student has recovered about of their pandemic-era learning losses in math and a quarter in reading.
Evidence-based practices, such as tutoring, high-quality curricula and extended learning time, are starting to get baked into school systems, she said, which she hopes will last beyond stimulus funds.
Yet, many of these practices still aren鈥檛 reaching nearly enough students.
For example, across four major, urban public school systems in 2023, 8th graders with disabilities and English language learners continued to score significantly lower than their peers in English Language Arts. In New York City, 61% of all students demonstrated proficiency, while only 29% of students with disabilities and 9% of English learners did.
Chronic absenteeism also disproportionately plagues special populations, according to Sass鈥檚 analysis. And parents expressed frustration that during school closures their kids weren鈥檛 getting access to their legally required interventions. Simultaneously, they were concerned that expectations for their children were being lowered, while communication was dwindling.
鈥淥ne of our researchers started referring to this as ghosting,鈥 said Lake. 鈥淭hat the parents were being ghosted by their schools 鈥 [and] not getting information about how their kids were doing academically.鈥
Ultimately, they felt blindsided when they found out just how far behind their children had fallen. As students have returned to school buildings, more have been flagged as having special learning needs and requiring special education, after a dip during the pandemic.
Especially when looking at 鈥淐OVID babies,鈥 those who didn鈥檛 necessarily get access to preschool or typical socialization, Lake wondered, 鈥淎re they being funneled into special education as a solution or do they really have a disability that needs to be addressed in special education?鈥 And, she added, 鈥淚s special education equipped to deal with this influx?鈥
CRPE鈥檚 analysis found that special education identification rates varied greatly across school districts in Massachusetts, which reports more detailed data than most other states. For example, the rate of identification in kindergarten in Boston grew from 14% to 18% between 2018 and 2024, while about an hour away in Worcester, the pre-K identification jumped far more, from 26% to 38%. Lake said this variation demonstrates that the approach to identification matters, but still 鈥渢here are more questions than answers on this front.鈥
Lake emphasized that while special populations may be struggling more acutely, many of the issues they face in the classroom are similar to those of their peers.
鈥淲hile we鈥檙e seeing a lot of kids moving into special education right now, maybe we need to flip the narrative and think about solving for the kids with the most complex needs,鈥 she said. 鈥淎nd if we can figure out how to do that, making sure that all kids can be successful.鈥
Did you use this article in your work?
We鈥檇 love to hear how The 74鈥檚 reporting is helping educators, researchers, and policymakers.